I'm using the Matrix specs as a benchmark as that's probably the standard Rockstar are looking to surpass.ĬPU: Quad Core Intel or AMD clocking 2.5GHz and above.

As we speak there is an opening for a Photogrammetry artist at Rockstar, hinting that the environment should be on-par with The Matrix Demo. Unreal recently acquired Quixel, who are known for their extremely high quality scanned art. Somewhere last year T2 patented a new AI pathfinding solution for AI to generate navigation paths on the fly, as well as Tobias Kleanthous mentioning in a GDC talk how they are looking into ways to streamline world creation and animation with Machine Learning techniques.įinally there is Photgrammetry.

Next there's the pathfinding solution and ML developments. Reports have shown that development began in some form in 2014, and Rockstar have a tendency to complete the story first before diving into visuals. But to be realistic I don't think that's when they began making GTA 6. I know, I know, Dan Houser, who was the lead writer left back in 2020. GTA 4, GTA 5 and RDR2 on the other hand seem to get this right from the get go. Unreal Engine's Matrix Demo had amazing visuals but I still feel the character animation was a tad uncanny. Their Euphoria Animation Engine has always seemed a step ahead of current animation frameworks. RDR2 used Split sum approximation for it's lighting(I don't think I've totally understood this), and considering RDR2 didn't even use RTX I have a good feeling the lighting is on par. To put this into perspective Unreal Engine 5 only supports a maximum resolution of 12K.

RAGE has had 16K texture support since late 2018(Post RDR2). I've spent a good week digging up what I could about Rockstars recent endeavours with their RAGE engine.

Gta 6 graphics